Program Evaluation for Non-Profit Organization

An plaque necessitate to put in place an military rating process to as legitimate whether it is accomplishing its goals or not. Such paygrade would then become a very heavy part of the ensuing planning process. There ar two ship bottom of the inningal in which an organisation conducts an rating. One is intended to proceed with the evaluation by means of the goals established by the agreement. The other is to conduct the evaluation through the processes in place in the organization.With goal-based evaluation, the organization seeks to d receive the stairsstand whether the avowed goals have been achieved or exceeded. It has an emphasis on outputs instead of processes. Even with limited re microbes and difficult situations, the goal-based evaluation looks at the outputs based on the inputs and other raw materials put into the process. It is unremarkably useful for organizations that atomic number 18 beating deadlines, or seeking to meet targets granted limited resources, t ime, and manpower. Results are given primacy in this charitable of evaluation (Edvardsson & Hansson, 2003).Process-based evaluation focuses on efficiency and effectiveness. It is geared towards minimizing costs while ensuring that the goals are achieved. With this kind of evaluation, the goals to be achieved are given and are expected to be delivered. In doing so, the organization is freed from looking at the achievement of the goals because such is expected. What the organization is focal point on, however, is the way that the goals are being achieved. be they effective and efficient? Are they contributing to the boilers suit objectives of the organization? Is there a way that such processes could be improved and geared to help the organization achieve more(prenominal) than? Are the policies of the organization sound and the different departments coordinating smoothly with for each one other? Through these questions, the organization is taking a look at the way in which it c an achieve its goals by improving its processes. The goals are important but processes are more important in certain respects because of their systemic nature. Depending on the circumstances, however, a goal-based organization may be more important than a process-oriented one (Ott, 2001).In addition to this, process-based evaluation takes a look at the policies, programs, coordination systems, and other processes at work in the organization. It makes use of a systemic view of the organization and seeks to integrate all important aspect of the organization in the evaluation process. It is more all-encompassing than goal-based evaluation as it may take more time to be completed (Ott, 2001).Application of Evaluation StylesGoal-based evaluation may be more appropriate in situations where the non-profit organization is evaluating unneurotic with their clientele. In the case of an organization dedicated to community development, a goal-based evaluation would be suitable for a discussi on with the community regarding the achievements of the goals. Usually, if the goals are not accomplished or achieved, the people, together with the non-profit organization can brainstorm on the problems that are being go about(predicate) by the community.In addition to this, it would be important to evaluate themselves about the hindrances that they face in accomplishing the goals identified during the planning phase. Goal-based evaluation in any case looks at the actual outputs of the organizations project. If the project is about reducing the spell of substance addicts in the neighborhood, then a goal-based evaluation would say that the program is successful if there is a significant decline in the calculate of offenders.On the other hand, process-based evaluation would take a look at the overall systemic performance of the organization. Even if the results are phenomenal if the processes are not firmly in place, then such an evaluation would be careful in proclaiming succes s. It would look at the coordination systems, the teamwork of the organization, as well as the ethical side of things. With such an evaluation, it becomes important to look at the overall strategy of the organization instead of simply focusing on achieved goals (Ott, 2001).Establishing the manakin of a New nonprofit organization OrganizationAs a sore Executive Director of a noncommercial organization, there are some(prenominal) things I need to do in order to ensure that the organization is setup and would thrive in the process. Without the necessary legal and financial role model, the nonprofit organization is bound to fail. The following strategies outline what necessitate to be do for this organization.The first step, of course, would be to define what the organization is all aboutthe kinds of go to be offered and the way it will be structured. The vision, mission, and goals of the organization have to be defined. The structure, on the other hand, would enable the organiz ation to achieve its goals.Registration and sub judice PersonalityThe nonprofit organization should acquire its legal personality by being registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission or its equivalent. Through this, the nonprofit organization will be able to transact legally under the uprightnesss of the terra firma and will be able to purchase property and open accounts under its own name. This also prevents unscrupulous persons to setup accounts and secure properties in their own names at the expense of the organization. With a legal personality, however, also comes responsibility. As such, the organization may sue persons and it can also be sued. It consequently needs to comply with legal requirements of organizations.Securing AdvisersThe nonprofit organization also needs legal and financial advisers so that it would not violate any law or ordinance even accidentally. A legal counsel would be needed. Although there are lawyers offering pro-bono services, it would a lso be a wakeless idea to include the lawyers fee in the budget of the organization.Securing FundingAs part of the strategy of the organization, the Executive director also needs to look for sources of funding from different organizations. Private corporations and even countries do fund initiatives for development. It takes a careful research of these organizations. Without a steady source of funding, the organization will not prosper and will only swag if there is no steady funding.As part of the financial framework of the organization, there should also be a means to ensure transparence and accountability. This would be important in ensuring that the donors trust the organization and for the organization to stick by to governmental rules such as Sarbanes-Oxley. Although SOX, as Sarbanes-Oxley is called, was meant for companies for profit, it has provisions for non-profit organizations. Adhering to these accounting regulations can also help in enhancing the overall strategy, int egrity, and transparency of the organization.ReferenceEdvardsson, K. & Hansson, S. O. (2003). When is a goal rational?. Social Choice and Welfare, 24 (2), 343-361.Ott, J. S. (2001). The Nature of the Nonprofit Sector. New York Westview Press.