Mendez vs Westminster Essay

We alto causeher k straightaway of the famed running game that happen on whitethorn 17, 1954, a trial that ended each t centenarian segregation in school districts wholly over the linked States of America. With this justice beingness enforce by the 14th amendment, it interchange the whole nation, colored people were now being allowed to enter into real academician schools, and compete for a collapse future. Of channel I am talking to the highest degree the Oliver Brown v. tabular array of direction of Topeka, better known as Brown vs. the bill of direction. Even though this trial was a large stepping st iodin in the United States, it was not the first attempt at the desegregation of the school system.There was another(prenominal) parapraxis that was the creation of Brown vs. the card of Education. This teddy has been forgotten over term due to the huge popularity of Brown vs. the placard of Education. Even though Brown vs. the batting order of Education was more popular, two cases were authoritative and had a large amount of similarities. The single differences were that the first was fought seven years forward to the second and a difference of ethnicity. both cases were important in many ways, the exclusively problem is, why is it that solely unrivaled is credited and the other not? two cases were fought for the similar reason. Mendez vs. Westminster was the first big motor lodge case that stopped segregation in all the schools systems of the state of atomic number 20. The reason I say this is the stepping stone of Brown vs. the Board of Education is because The Ninth Circuit judicatory of Appeals ruled in the favor of Mendez vs. Westminster, which conclude to the desegregation of schools all over atomic number 20 this was the stepping stone to Brown vs. the board of Education because it was seven years prior to the notion of Brown.The Mendez case was used to back up the Brown vs. Board of Education case and doed shape th e ideas of a young NAACP attorney, Thurgood marshal, it very(prenominal) surprising to people to see that Thurgood Marshall was also a justiceyer in the Mendez case. You may be thinking that only LULAC (which is a Latino organization) was the only one involved with this case only if as you now know, the NCAAP contri onlyed their part (Maria Blanco, The undestroyable touch of Mendez v. Westminster in the Struggle for Desegregation, Thu, Mar 25, 2010, http//www. immigrationpolicy. rg/perspectives/lasting-impact-mendez-v-westminster-struggle-desegregation). This was considerable because it forced two different ethnicities and cultures center together for the same cause, which was to deplete the same education as white individuals and to combine school campuses. We are going to be looking more into the narration of the trial Mendez vs. Westminster, as well as how and why it started and similarities between both the Mendez case, as well as the Brown Case. On April 1947 on tha t point was a decision ruling on the Mendez vs. the Board of Education.The United States of America woo of Appeals for the 9th Circuit in San Francisco ruled in favor of Mendez and the other parents that stood up to the Westminster teach District. Judge McCormick stated that according to calcium Laws the segregation of Mexican-American public school children in the absence of a state truth mandating their segregation violate California law as well as the peer protection of the law clause of the 14th Amendment to the U. S. Constitution (A History of Mexican Americans in California, Wed, Nov 17 2004 100000 pm PDT http//www. cr. nps. gov/ history/online_books/5views/5views5h99. htm).The reason this lawsuit did not go all the way to the Supreme tourist court was because in the Courts ruling, it noted that the United States Supreme Courts segregation decisions were not controlling because, at this time, thither was no Hispanic melt In this era all Mexican Americans were considered Caucasian. The key fact . . . was that Californias Education Code did not specifically provide for segregation of children of Mexican origin. . . . And since California law did not allow for sort Mexican schools, the requirement that children at track down such schools could be considered ar molybdenumrary carry through taken without due process of law. (Charles Wollenberg, all told Deliberate Speed, 1976, p. 127)This case could not have gone to the Supreme Court because the law of the state said nothing about(predicate) segregating Mexican Americans in the Constitution (http//www. cr. nps. gov/history/online_books/5views/5views5h99. htm). On Brown vs. the Board of Education it was a piddling different, because Black was considered a different race and according to the Plessey vs. Ferguson case of 1896, it states it could segregate a race, as longsighted as it provides a separate but equal law (http//www. cr. nps. gov/history/online_books/5views/5views5h99. tm). now that we know a little bit more information about the trial, lets chequer why all the Mexican American parents got together in order for their kids to get the same education as all the other Caucasian kids in the locality. It all started in the late 1920s-1930s.As the Mexican and Mexican American population started to ontogenesis in California, more white Americans started get scared this led to segregation in schools. Not only were schools getting discriminate but housing was also being segregated as well (Maria Blanco, The Lasting Impact of Mendez v. Westminster in the Struggle for Desegregation, pg. 2 Thu, Mar 25, 2010). It all started in 1945 with Gonzalo and Felicitas Mendez, who were upstart to the city and had just move to a farm in Westminster. The reason they moved to Westminster was because they had leased a farm there from a Japanese family, due to Roosevelts executive order 9066. As the Mendez family displace their kids to the public school constrictivest to their n eighborhood one early morning, which was the Seventeenth channel shallow, Westminster, in chromatic County.The parents were shocked when both kids had to return, because they could not attend the school do to their race. They had to attend the Mexican American School that was further away. That was not the only case, the Mexican American schools that were built for the children, were unethical. The 17th passageway School was not only cross out new, but it also had had a bewitching sportground, it had a nice cafeteria, it had good educators that could help the students, and do not forget a non-electronic fence. How could you compare that with pout, which was the Mexican school? hang around was old and next to a scare pasture that was made out of old barracks WESTCOTT, JOHN. OUR LEGACY MILLENNIUM MOMENTS Family Rejected Mexican School Mendez Vs. Westminster Ended State separatism Ahead of U. S MORNING Edition. Orange County Register,1999). Robbie who was one of the Mexican A merican students, that was vatical to attend 17th Street School, but because of his ethnicity had to go to the other school Hover explains his experience, It was a terrible little shack, I dont even look upon having any monkey bars or any swings or anything like that to play with.In fact when we had to eat lunch, we would go outside and eat lunch at the tables that were next to the cow pasture. There was cable around the cow pasture to lionise the cows out, but it was electrocuted. There was a little bit of electricity at that time it was allowed to have a little bit of electricity on the wires to support the cows from getting too close to the fence (Espinosa, Martina, California hidden syllabus institutional Discrimination in the one-fourth Grade, pg. 57).